I've read all the post so far and what I see are people feeling uncomfortable, squirming.
Yep, I'm an X, but still hanging in there and educating people out the door.
Squirm squirm
i would really like to read the thoughts of an evolutionist as they lie on their deathbed.
their "honest to nogod" thoughts.
their terrors.
I've read all the post so far and what I see are people feeling uncomfortable, squirming.
Yep, I'm an X, but still hanging in there and educating people out the door.
Squirm squirm
i would really like to read the thoughts of an evolutionist as they lie on their deathbed.
their "honest to nogod" thoughts.
their terrors.
I would really like to read the thoughts of an evolutionist as they lie on their deathbed. Their "honest to noGod" thoughts. Their terrors. Their nightmares. Their fears.
I would like to crawl deep into the recesses of their mind and see it for myself.
Do they really believe all that noise they spread? As they lay there contemplating their final breaths, do they really believe that soon, they will cease to exist, in a dying world that teeters on the brink of annihilation, a world that wont remember them and that will one day cease to exist also.
Do they really believe that they will be gone, truly gone, forever, like they never existed in the first place?
Or in that final time, do they entertain that ever prevalent notion that they will go to heaven, or be resurrected, or even come back as a goat. That somehow, somewhere, it's not really "over", done, finito?..
i intend for this to be one of a series of bite-sized ops on the evidence for evolution.. introduction to dna genes are sequences of dna made up of words (codons) each of which are three letters (bases) long.
there are only four letters in the genetic alphabet (acg&t) each word or codon is the recipe for one amino acid.
there are 20 different amino acids in living organisms.
"If all living things evolved from a common ancestor then we can make a prediction about the differences between the Cytochrome C protein in different species. We would expect them to differ from each other in a predictable way that mirrors their evolutionary history."
Pseudoscience BS ...like I was saying. You make up high sounding blather and try to pass it off as science. There is no "evolutionary history" to match. That cart is in front of the horse and it don't run.
"Predictable " ...please.
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
synonyms: | hypothesis, thesis, conjecture, supposition, speculation, postulation, postulate, proposition, premise, surmise, assumption, presupposition; |
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
Lots of steamroller comments...
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
So, whatshall, ...you think that pasting a pic of Pat Stewart in his role as star fleet dude is science that proves you correct?
typical..
#1 protein functional redundancy comparing the sequences of amino acids in ubiquitous proteins confirms the relationship between all living things..
#2 dna functional redundancy comparison of the dna that codes for the amino acids of ubiquitous proteins predicts the tree of life with an astonishing degree of accuracy..
#3 ervs endogenous retroviruses that infected our ancestors are found in the same place of the genome of our closest primate cousins..
What the evolutionary "thinkers" believe is that if you find common traits between two things, one of those things came from the other spontaneously.
That about sums up all the "links" above.
Evolutionists offer no proof that spontaneous and beneficial mutations have ever taken place. They just have "faith" that it does.
I know there are plenty of evolutionists here, and I know how they behave towards those who will not accept their nonsense. They are rude and forceful, just like the rest of the evolutionary society who rams their ideas down the throats of society and steamroll over anyone who objects.
In rejecting Watchtower, which I applaud, most discard everything. They adopt and angry, in your face denial of true science, in favor of pseudoscientific garble.
ok. Let m have your anger.
many of us here have commented on the deceitful friday afternoon video shown at the 2017 rc that discussed 1975.. the video attempted to shift the blame onto congregation members for the fiasco saying, "some were looking to a certain date as signifying the end of this old system of things.".
this same video mentions how, “a few even went so far as selling their homes and quitting their jobs.”.
we all know that the wt leadership created this teaching and endorsed it right up to its abject failure.. now below is the concluding talk given on sunday at the rc.
It's interesting to be exposed to both those who defend the watchtower blindly to the end on the 1975 issue and also those who are irritated by it, yet stick, somehow, to the organization through it all.
For they who accept the biblical account, or at least the historical one, the majority of Jews in Jerusalem stayed till the Romans butchered them like cattle. (see Josephus)
I imagine their blessed religious leaders were there to keep them all in line so that the Roman Machine could grind their bones to powder.
i just saw a video from mike and kim where (@6:00) she says:.
you know what i noticed in the new watchtower cd-roms?
is when you do a search for certain things that they would deem maybe apostates or certain questions, you can't find them in the search.. i know that sometimes, they get carried away and are not always factual.
"Today, a Christian who serves only because he wants to live forever in Paradise could also be serving with a selfish motive."
(First, they make you feel evil for wanting to live forever and then go right on to dangle that same carrot again)
"Today, over six million true worshippers ...Are you one of them? If not, then mediate on what God offers .... THE HOPE OF LIVING FOREVER "
And the dubs never seem to see through this crap.
i had a similar question on my nclex exam for my nursing license.
in the rapid changing beliefs of jws what is the correct answer?.
.
I'd like to see this question on the nursing exam.
Is it okay to browse through Jehovah's Witnesses patient records, whether these patients are in hospital or not, to discern if these patients are compliant with the Watchtower governing body latest dogma on blood transfusion?
Is it okay to report to your elders the names of any Jehovah's Witnesses who have information in their records indicating that they have accepted or will accept blood products disallowed by Watchtower dogma?